Given the ambiguity regarding whether objections were required to preserve error with respect to the comments at issue, we will assume, without deciding, that Dozier s complaints are reviewable and determine whether the alleged errors caused egregious harm.
The trial court excluded the question about the meaning of the tattoo, ruling that evidence regarding its meaning would not be relevant.
And Lord Melvin must also be just as compelling.
In issue six, Dozier complains the trial court erred by excluding evidence about the significance of Joseph s tattoo.
Dozier pled not guilty and claimed that she had acted in self-defense.
Nevertheless, after reviewing the record for fundamental error, in our opinion, the comments and the rulings at issue did not affect Dozier s substantial rights.
The jury found Dozier guilty of murder and sentenced her to fifteen years imprisonment.
Career Start and End: to Present.